|
JONESIN' FOR A LESLIETHE QUEST FOR THAT LESLIE GUITAR SOUND
The Leslie Doppler effect produces vibrato (cyclic frequency variation) and
tremolo (cyclic amplitude variations). The mix varies through the frequency
spectrum, when projected through the horn and rotor, which rotate in opposite
directions. Another distinctive characteristic of the Leslie sound is the change
in speeds between the slow chorale and the fast tremolo ("ramp up/down"): Just
like a car, it takes time to go from 0 to 60 mph (or brake). The lighter horn
and the heavier bass rotor ramp up and down at different rates.
The main downside to using a Leslie speaker is that they're big, heavy, and
have peculiar sound projection characteristics. The big & heavy part is easy
enough to see, since they look like furniture and no sane person likes to hump
heavy furniture. However, the sound projection is unlike any other speaker:
The spinning parts hurl sound around the room, and the environment (reflectivity
of walls & speaker placement) plays a big role in the sound that reaches the
eardrums. Because of this, for the wattage, they're not as loud as a stationary
speaker that's aimed at your eardrums. The rotating parts also make a palpable
"swooshing" sound from the air being pushed around. It's all part of the in-person
sensory experience-- a mono or stereo recording doesn't capture the full essence
of the experience, and the wind noise and belt whine aren't something that's
purposefully replicated in any rotary speaker simulator I've encountered (not
that it needs to be). Furthermore, a recording of the Leslie sound always represents
a particular microphone(s) placement. Even with stationary speakers, microphone
placement has a dramatic affect on the resultant sound. Close-miking a Leslie
emphasizes the throbbing tremolo component over the vibrato; at a greater distance,
that difference is averaged out.
If you're looking to get the complex sound of a rotating speaker with a direct
mono/stereo output and without the size, weight and maintenance requirements
of the real thing, a stompbox simulation looks like a really attractive proposition.
Another point in their favor is that you can't crank up a real Leslie at 4 AM
and play through headphones (well, you can, but sleeping people probably will
hate you...).
THE STOMPBOX SOLUTION A bunch of stompbox pedals have come out since
the '60s that produce modulation effects electronically, no doubt inspired by
the Leslie speaker. I've read that the Phase Shifter was the first; the Univibe
(Hendrix/Band of Gypsies/Machine Gun, Robin Trower) was another early attempt.
(The Flanger was inspired by a recording studio trick, so it doesn't really
qualify.) Modulation effects
can sound similar to a Leslie, and that may be good enough for many folks. I
think that the Chorus pedal is probably the closest of the non-Leslie simulators
in capturing the slow Leslie chorale sound. Combinations of these pedals may
approximate the fast speed mode, and you can manually simulate the ramp up/down
speeds. At any rate, times have changed, technology has lept forward, and
Flangers, Phaser Shifters and Vibes have established their own distinct sound
identities: Presently, they aren't considered rotating speaker simulators since
there's a newer category of effects specifically for that.
Once you start searching for a rotary speaker simulator, you may find that
there's a limited selection available (compared to Overdrive pedals). It's a
specialized topic, mainly of interest to keyboard players, so there aren't as
many Internet reviews or discussions, and some of the most recommended choices
aren't available anymore. Many folks mention the Dynacord CLS222 as the best
ever made, but it hasn't been available since the early nineties. The sound
samples I've heard do sound very good. They show up occasionally on eBay, but
they're expensive. The highly-rated Hughes & Kettner's Rotosphere is a more
recently discontinued product that's easier to find (but still, isn't cheap).
I've bought several through the years: Hughes & Kettner's Rotosphere Mark
II, Digitech's EX-7 Expression Factory pedal, Line 6's ToneCore Rotosound, Danelectro's
Rocky Road and DLS's RotoSIM. The rotary speaker FX is also available in various
multi-effects processors like Line 6's PodXT and Roland's VG-99, as well as
in some amps. There are others that I chose not to buy, like Boss's RT-20 Rotary
Speaker Simulator (tried briefly in store but didn't like), Option 5's Destination
Rotation (wasn't impressed by sound sample) and Voce's Spin II (no info)-- funds
are limited, so I researched Internet opinions and sound samples to help steer
me to my choices.
FWIW, There's a saying about opinions... bottom line is that they should always
be taken with a grain of salt (including mine-- I'm certainly no expert). I
know it sounds snotty, but I've spent some bucks based on opinions, and later
wondered if the opinion-givers knew what a real rotating speaker sounded like.
Shocking, huh? I reckon that when you're happy with a purchase, there's a real
strong urge to tell the world good things about it.
Clearly, hearing a sample is better, but unfortunately I've never heard an
Internet sound sample or Youtube video for any of them that screamed "BUY ME!!!"...
and in hindsight, that might have been a clue. An in-store or at-home trial
would be ideal, but rotary simulators are an esoteric piece of hardware that
have a hard time competing with the plethora of overdrive pedals for retail
shelf space. Fortunately, they're available via mail order from places with
satisfaction guarantees, but return postage costs can be expensive.
I think that the easiest Leslie sound to replicate is the fast mode, as heard
in Stevie Ray Vaughan's "Cold Shot" (probably the most recognized of modern
usage). It's a Vibratone running at fast speed, so there isn't that much subtlety
involved. Soundgarden's "Black Hole Sun" has another example of a rotary speaker
in fast mode. To my ears, any of the stompbox simulators is probably as good
as any another for getting that sound. The Leslie mode that I like most is the
slow chorale, especially when it has a distorted, "grinding" and organ-like
quality. This is the sound that's heard on the old Blind Faith tunes. The other
distinguishing feature I like are the ramp up/down sounds; This is the brief
transitory mode between the fast and slow speeds that sounds great when it's
actively managed. Organists are masters of this. The simulators include an overdrive
function, which I usually turn down or off if possible; I prefer getting overdrive
through other means.
PHYSICS SIMULATION VS. HARDWARE MODELING I've come to believe that
that there's a difference between a "rotary speaker simulator" and a "Leslie
modeler". Although products don't refer to the distinction, I believe that some
manufacturers focus on electronically simulating the physics of a rotating speaker
(doppler effect, ramp speed, etc.), but don't focus on modeling the tonal coloration
of the actual hardware. Unearthing
the Mysteries of the Leslie Cabinet provides an excellent in-depth analysis
of the hardware, and the way that it creates that distinctive sound. The sound
through a horn driver and drum rotor isn't hi-fi and it has a distinctive resonance
that may not sound great when simulated and amplified to a high volume through
a guitar amp speaker. A pedal that focuses on "transparency"-- preserving the
guitar's natural tonality -- probably isn't going to sound like a real Leslie
speaker unless the guitar signal is preprocessed through an equalizer. However,
a rotary physics simulator may be a more practical tool for adapting to a variety
of playing situations. The tonality modeling approach appears to be more set-in-stone
& less flexible as a single modeled sound. It doesn't scale up to volume
change as well as the separate components of a real Leslie cabinet. (That's
just my WAG for why pedals that capture the Leslie tone don't do as well at
higher volume levels.)
For one reason or another, I'm not completely satisfied with any of the stompbox
simulators I've bought. Sound-wise, it's a very subjective call and that's reflected
in the imprecise vocabulary that's commonly used to describe the sonic qualities
of guitar gear. Basically, I knew the sound I was looking for, but it didn't
have to be perfect. The convenience factor counts for a lot, so I was willing
to make allowances for the fact that a Leslie simulation through a stationary
speaker is going to lack some aspects of the in-person experience of the real
deal.
The enclosure is a sturdy metal box, fairly huge by stompbox standards (approx. 8" x 8"), with a cool blue light shining through an opening to show the tube. Three footswitches allow you to switch the effect in/out (true bypass), stop the rotors from spinning ("breaker") , and toggle the speed (ramp up/down). The knobs allow adjustment of gain, output level, and balance between the high and low frequency rotors. Trimpots are accessible from the top to adjust the running speeds of the rotors. LEDs show whether the unit is on/off, the breaker engaged, and speeds of the rotors. The unit has stereo inputs and outputs, with a switch to match input impedance to guitar or keyboard. Remote stomp switches can be connected to control in/out and the speed. Finally, the unit is powered by a non-standard wall-wart, through a 1/8" plug-- and with very specific instructions to use only their power supply.
I like the sound of the Rotosphere. It's very clear, crisp, and uh... "shimmery".
It sounds great when run in stereo, and the ramp up/down models the different
speeds that the horn and rotor spin at. I'm less enamored of the tube preamp
simply because it (or the analog circuitry) introduces a lot of hiss. Mainly
though, I don't think it adds much to the sound that couldn't be done by other
means (overdrive pedal or the amp), making for a much smaller package. Consequently,
this makes the pedal bigger, with special power requirements. While it's certainly
more practical than a real Leslie, it doesn't nail the Leslie sound 100%, and
I felt that there should be something out there with as good or better sound
in a smaller package, with more standardized power requirements.
[Note, 08/02/08: This just came back from loan, so I've had a chance
to reassess some aspects of it. The hiss can be minimized to an acceptable
level by fiddling with the Drive and Output knobs. It actually sounds
better than I recalled it sounding, and responds well to an overdriven
input signal.]
I consider this to be a "Leslie modeler". It has a great growling grind when
in slow speed, and gets very close to the "Badge" sound. Yes, it colors
the guitar's sound very heavily and you're stuck with the way it sounds--
a consequence of this pedal's "Swiss Army knife" approach with a limited
common set of knobs, and perhaps limitations of the technology. Using
the pedal (instead of a switch) to change the ramp speed feels a little
weird, but it does work as it should sound, with a delayed ramp up/down.
Unfortunately, I found that the modeling of the Leslie sound didn't work
well with my Cube 60 amps at high volume levels-- there's a sharp frequency
peak that resonates with the speakers, and sounds really awful, almost
like feedback. It was slightly better through my Twin Reverb.
Nevertheless, it's a pretty amazing gizmo, considering that it's packed with
so many cool effects in a wah wah pedal-sized package. I think the main disappointment
(other than the Leslie's resonance) is that it can only be one thing at a time--
and changing modes is not something you'd likely do on a dark stage. You'd need
an up/down selector switchbox, and there's no indicator to let you know which
mode is selected. The knobs are awfully tiny and difficult to decipher at a
glance too.
The pedal has a number of control options. There are pots to set the fast and slow speed, rotor balance, and drive. In addition, there are 3-position slide switches to select the ramp up/down time (slow/medium/fast) and the tone (to model 3 Leslie models: the 145, the L16 (vibratone) & the 122. The footswitch is totally unlike other stompbox footswitches: A light tap initiates speed change and a heavier stomp switches the effect in/out. It's a little weird feeling and doesn't inspire great confidence in the switches' durability; It's definitely not as straight-forward as two separate switches on a pedal's face, but this keeps the pedal at a compact size.
This isn't a true-bypass pedal so it requires power even when it's bypassed. It powers up with the effect on and in the fast speed mode. If there's power supply noise in the signal, you'll hear it when the pedal is in bypass. You can even hear the modulation chuffing when in bypass. There's a slight but noticeable boost when the effect is engaged.
Many folks don't like this pedal since it colors the guitar sound very
heavily and can sound awfully muddy at high volume levels. Tonally, it
attempts to capture the Leslie sound of "Badge" more than some costly
and highly-regarded pedals (although it's a little over-the-top). This
was a natural approach for Line 6, since they specialize in digital modeling
of actual hardware. They've modeled the quirky frequency response and
resonance of 3 Leslie models, whereas other pedal manufacturers seem to
focus on simulating the physics of the rotating speaker principle, rather
than a specific model.
Between the 3 models selection and rotor balance, you can probably find something that you like. It's not a complete simulation of the rotating speaker physics though; the ramp up/down doesn't model the difference rates of the horn and rotor spin up/down, as it does in the H&K Rotosphere. Only a die-hard rotating speaker geek would notice and care about that though.
This would be a good selection for a pedal board except... The pedal lacks true bypass and the bypassed mode isn't always clean-- I've heard power supply hum and a faint phantom pumping from the effect circuitry when the thing was supposed to be bypassed. I think the biggest downside of this pedal is in its powering. Although you can use a battery, I suspect that this pedal, like most digital pedals, is a power-hog. Unfortunately, the ToneCore series is well-known for being "difficult" when sharing power in simple daisy-chained power supplies. It works best with its own separate Line 6 wall-wart, or with an expensive power supply with isolated outputs. Visual Sound even singles out the ToneCore series as incompatible with their Spot One switching power supply.
My main disappointment is the ramp speed, which takes waaaaay tooooo looooong.
Maybe it intentionally models a unit with a slipping belt? Unfortunately, there's
not a built-in way to change that. That's a near deal-killing deficiency for
me. Besides that, this is one case where the compact size of the pedal is actually
a significant negative-- the knobs and switch are too small, and the too-far
recessed stomp switches make you doubt whether your switch stomping has been
successful (especially with the slow ramp up/down, since it's subtle and there's
no LED to indicate speed). As others have said, this is clearly designed for
barefooted guitarists who are skilled at pressing buttons with their big toe.
This makes it pretty unusable in a performance setting unless you leave it on
all the time (or are a barefooted guitarist with a well-trained big toe). I
suppose you could glue marbles on the switches?
I really wanted to like this pedal and had high hopes for it, since
it might mean the end of my search (yay!). Unfortunately (sigh)... for
my tastes, this pedal's biggest disappointment is that it's too "transparent".
Before I bought (and returned) mine, I didn't know what forum posters
meant when they claimed it was more "sterile" than the H&K. I think they
meant that the pedal doesn't have much effect/tonal color; it makes your
guitar sound like your guitar, and not like a real Leslie box. At chorale
speeds with a clean guitar sound, the effect can be very subtle. Even
though Output B is more heavily flavored and there's a trimpot to blend
the effect/straight signal, the factory adjustment is only 1/16th of a
turn away from fully clockwise: I wanted to turn up the effect ratio at
least 50% more, but alas, there is no more! This reflects what I generally
felt about this pedal's many knobs and adjustments: The pedal operates
within a mild sonic range of transparency, so many of the knobs seem to
have only a subtle and minor effect. For example, the "Overdrive Gain"
knob does produce a noticeable change, but the knob's full travel is like
turning up the gain of an overdrive pedal from 7:00 to 8:00. It's like
that for the Tweeter & Bass Rotor level knobs, and the Tweeter Response
trimpot. Yeah, you can hear the difference, but I found myself wondering
whether it was worth the bother. This was the pedal that gave me the idea
that there was a fundimental difference between the simulator vesus modeler
approach. This one's called "RotoSIM" for a good reason.
One of the main things I look for in these pedals is the ability to get that
"grinding" sound. Some don't do it on their own (even using the built-in Overdrive/Growl/Gain
control) so they have to be fed a distorted signal. This usually makes the rotary
effect stand out more, and can over-emphasize the high frequency swishing to
the point where it sounds wrong and patently artificial, like a phase shifter.
With this pedal, I noticed something else, weird but familiar-- At medium speed,
an artifact of the modulation sounded similar to the vowel-ish modulation tone
I get from my BBE "Soul Vibe", a Univibe clone. I don't consider that to be
a good thing, since the Univibe isn't a particularly accurate simulation of
a rotating speaker (It's great for that unique Univibe sound though). As I looked
at the circuitboard and saw two things that look like opto-couplers (the heart
of the Univibe sound), I had to wonder...??? In fairness though, I don't have
a clue how this thing works.
A lot of people really like this pedal, so I'm probably in the minority in my tepid assessment of it. I think it's because most people aren't comparing it to the tonality of the "Badge" Leslie, and simply like the way it sounds and transparently responds through their setup. It's a neat sound, but I consider it a simulation of the rotating speaker physics rather than an accurate modeling of a specific, real Leslie speaker, so it therefore doesn't have "That Sound". I'd been hoping that the combination of current state-of-the-art electronics and spending enough bucks would finally give me the best of both worlds: a true "Leslie in a stompbox", with adjustments to take it from transparent to heavily colored. Nope, not The One.
I recently played through their 100 watt SRV-212 model at a store. I
was very tempted... despite that at low volume, I could hear a slight
belt squeal when changing speeds, and the single-coil pickups on the store's
Strat clearly picked up and amplified the motor's electromagnetic field
when I was in close proximity. If the salesdude had checked back, I might
have thrown reason & practicality out the window and bought the sucker.
In retrospect, I'm glad I didn't. Despite the compact size, there were
the questions of "Where would I put the sucker?", "Do I really need another
amp-like thing?", "What amp will I run it from?", "Does the impedance
work with my amps?", "How would it fit in with my stereo amp setup?",
and "How do you bypass the thing?". Mainly though, the single rotor Vibratone
design didn't sound special enough to me to warrant dealing with those
issues-- it's an easier sound to electronically simulate than the horn/rotor
model, and some stompboxes came pretty close. It wasn't really a fair
test drive though, since I wasn't using my guitar & amp, and couldn't
really crank up as much as I would have liked. At any rate, I never heard
that particular tonality that I'd been searching for. Maybe hearing their
PRO-145 with its independently rotating horn & rotor would have pushed
me over the edge and motivated me to find the salesdude? Given the price,
I'm kind of glad that they didn't have one on the floor.
The PRO-3X is a small (20" x 16.5" x 6.5", 40-watt) amp with
a true rotary horn section and an output for the electronically simulated lower
rotor. The crossover between the two is 800 Hz, and the lower rotor simulation
is fed to an external amplifier. I felt that this held a lot of promise, since
the most "Leslie-like" portion of the sound happens in the upper frequencies
through the horn. The bass frequencies exhibit less frequency modulation (because
the wavelengths are longer) but plenty of amplitude modulation (the "throb",
or tremolo effect). When mulling over my decision/gamble to buy, I reasoned
that the quality of the simulated lower end wasn't as important as the quality
of the higher end-- and you can't get more authentic than having a real rotating
horn: The PRO-3X's horn is reputedly voiced like a Leslie model 147. Furthermore,
this worked with my 2-amp setup in a non-stereo, A/B switchable configuration.
The PRO-3X isn't nearly as portable as a pedal, but it's a lot smaller and lighter
than a cabinet with 12" speakers. Unfortunately, it's impossible to make a rotary
speaker that you can mute and play through headphones (unless you get the model
that's acoustically sealed), but you can play this one at very low volume and
send the internally mic'd horn & rotor sim mix out to a headphone monitor (which
doesn't sound nearly as good as playing through it "straight").
The controls plate has a lot of knobs for all the essential stuff: Gain,
Volume, FET Amp Mode, Horn Mid & Treble EQ, Simulator Low and High EQ,
and a Mix Output Blend for sending a mixed signal of the mic'd horn and
low rotor simulator. The circuit board has trimpots for fine tuning operational
parameters like ramp up/down and fast/slow speeds of the horn and simulated
rotor. The previous version (PRO-3T, discontinued) had a tube preamp;
this version features an FET (transistor) preamp that simulates a tube
amp's class A/AB/B bias setting. Basically, this affects how signal clipping
occurs when the gain is turned up and therefore affects how the "growl"
sounds.
If you don't connect the PRO-3X's simulated rotor to an external amplifier,
the horn sounds horrible! It's like playing your guitar through a narrow-band
megaphone. However, that's part of the magic: Once you introduce a mere hint
of the simulated rotor, the separate outputs magically blend in your ears to
produce "The Sound". I suspect that this blending occurs because bass is relatively
omnidirectional compared to the horn. Even when separated by several feet, they
still sound like a single, blended unit. As I said, it's like magic.
The other magic is that within moments of plugging it in, I was getting all
the true Leslie sounds that I'd been looking for, that I couldn't coax from
a stompbox simulator. The grinding "Nantucket Sleighride" sound was there, as
well as "Badge" and "Presence of the Lord". Cleaned up, the shimmering chime
of the Beatles and Badfinger were there as well.
Unfortunately, this solution is a compromise-- For a live performance solution, it's not as simple and convenient as a stompbox. The 40-watt horn can be awfully loud and piercing and should be complimented by a +100-watt amp for the bass/rotor simulator section; that's probably enough juice for a small venue. For larger venues, a combination of the mic'd horn and simulator amp out can be fed to a PA system.
For home use, that's not an issue: The unit is very usable at bedroom
volumes and doesn't need to be cranked up to get a good tone. The fact
that the distinctive tonality is produced by an actual horn and bass simulator
instead of being a modeled and played through a 12" speaker probably helps
with the scaleability issue-- it can easily be made to sound good loud
or soft, and isn't eaten up by bass or weird resonant peaks at when running
at high volumes.
CONCLUSION Oddly enough, I'm not obsessively fussy about the sound
of my guitars' pickups and the wood that their bodies are made of, or whether
I'm playing through my tube amp or my solid state amp. I can always manage to
dial in an acceptable sound. When it came to nailing that Leslie sound, I've
been very fussy. I had that Leslie sound burned into my brain decades ago, and
apparently it was impressive enough for me to recognize when I hadn't and when
I had achieved it. I've never felt that way about my long-lost '71 Deluxe Reverb!
If your brain isn't similarly imprinted (or cursed), any one of the electronic
simulators, or perhaps any modulation effect will probably sound pretty cool,
with the benefit of being a practical solution for your pedal board.
That's not to say that you can't get the Leslie tonality with a stompbox;
with equalization, many things are possible. From my experience though, it's
just not available through plug 'n' play.
If you can accept that, it's a matter of priorities and preferences. Stompbox
simulators vary wildly in price, from the relatively cheap Danelectro Rocky
Road (discontinued- approximately $40 on eBay) to the somewhat pricey DLS RotoSIM
($300). The H&K Rotosphere currently fetches anywhere from $300 to $500 on eBay,
and the rare Dynacord CLS-222 can fetch in the neighborhood of $700. The Digitech
EX-7 typically retails for around $200 (but it's a multi-function pedal). The
Line 6 Rotomachine typically goes for about $120; much less if you buy just
the core module.
If you want a simulator for a pedalboard, the footprint and power requirements
are probably important issues as well. The Line 6 Rotomachine and Danelectro
Rocky Road have the smallest footprints, and the H&K Rotosphere has the
largest. The DLS RotoSIM and Digitech EX-7 fall in between. The Danelectro Rocky
Road and DLS RotoSIM have the easiest power requirements (unfussy 9-volt DC);
the others require special power supplies (H&K Rotosphere & Digitech
EX-7) or need clean, isolated 9-volt DC (Line 6 Rotomachine). It's not an easy
decision with an obvious choice... and this isn't even a complete list of available
choices.
For those with my affliction,
my recommendation is to get the real deal first to take care of the jonesin';
then get a quality electronic simulator for gigging convenience and for an audience
that can't tell the difference...
--07/19/08, 08/02/08
ADDENDUM, 11/27/10: Neo Ventilator mp3 sample added below, with article.
Pretty much, this changes everything.
|